From: tclock@orion.oac.uci.edu (Tim Clock) Subject: Re: was:Go Hezbollah! Nntp-Posting-Host: orion.oac.uci.edu Organization: University of California, Irvine Lines: 25 In article bh437292@lance.colostate.edu writes: >In article <2BCE0918.6105@news.service.uci.edu>, tclock@orion.oac.uci.edu (Tim Clock) writes: >|> In article bh437292@lance.colostate.edu writes: > >[.....] > >|> Your view of this entire matter is far too serenely one-sided and >|> selectively naive. > >Oooh... now THAT hurts. I will not suffer you through more naive >and one-sided views of mine. Please skip my articles in the future >Oh Wise Tim, and have a good day. > >Basil What is the point in throwing out one-sided viewpoints (which means: ignoring that the "other side's" perspective and experience HAS ANY LEGITIMACY) while assuming that "your side" possesses no faults and bears no responbility for ANY of the negative impacts of a particular event? Isn't the former onesided? Isn't the latter naive? If you feel that my opinion is wrong then please tell me how. "Strategic withdrawal" under the cover of a snide remark seems to be the favored tactic on this net but doesn't accomplish anything.