From: himb@iniki.soest.hawaii.edu (Liz Camarra) Subject: Re: Which high-performance VLB video card? Organization: School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology Lines: 35 In article blean@rwb.esd.sgi.com (Bob Blean) writes: > >Someone in this group posted a little while back that they were getting an >Orchid V9000 card -- has that card arrived? What do the benchmarks look >like? The one I got only does about 4kb/s in text and 320x200 (VGA/MCGA) mode, which is almost identical to the other W5186 based cards (ATI 68800 does about 6kb/s). This is weird since the Orchid supposedly should be much faster (and I was told by someone that it can do almost 16 kb/s), since the VGA chip is covered by the Orchid label, I can't really tell for sure if it uses a 5286 chip, but the spec. sheet that comes with the board (no docs!) did say it has 1 meg dram and uses a 5286 chip. Winmarks (3.11) is about 4 mil. slower than a Viper (34 vs ~38) using standard palette. BTW if anyone is insterested, I'm trying to sell a Diamond Viper (2 megs vram) for a friend for $300, email if interested (I'm too broke to take it myself). >Also, is the AMI P9000-based card real? What does it use for VGA? Speed? I think it's available in limited quantites. No idea of what VGA chip it uses though. Be very careful with OEM P9000 boards though, the Orchid I got for example only has a readme file on disk that serve as documentation, and conflicts the hell with my VLB controller card (or maybe it's my motherboard, an A.I.R. 486 VLB) +----------------------------------------------------------------+ Stephen Lau, Elec. Engineering, Univ. of Hawaii *Using a friend's account while waiting for my new grad. account* + Death to FM synthesis! Go Gus! +