From: aron@tikal.ced.berkeley.edu (Aron Bonar) Subject: Re: Photoshop for Windows Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 26 Distribution: world NNTP-Posting-Host: tikal.ced.berkeley.edu In article <1993Apr22.011720.28958@midway.uchicago.edu>, dgf1@quads.uchicago.edu (David Farley) writes: |> In article beaver@rot.qc.ca (Andre Boivert) writes: |> > |> > |> >I am looking for comments from people who have used/heard about PhotoShop |> >for Windows. Is it good? How does it compare to the Mac version? Is there |> >a lot of bugs (I heard the Windows version needs "fine-tuning)? |> > |> >Any comments would be greatly appreciated.. |> > |> >Thank you. |> > |> >Andre Boisvert |> >beaver@rot.qc.ca |> > |> An review of both the Mac and Windows versions in either PC Week or Info |> World this week, said that the Windows version was considerably slower |> than the Mac. A more useful comparison would have been between PhotoStyler |> and PhotoShop for Windows. David |> I don't know about that...I've used Photoshop 2.5 on both a 486dx-50 and a Quadra 950...I'd say they are roughly equal. If anything the 486 was faster. Both systems were running in 24 bit color and had the same amount of RAM (16 megs) I also believe the quadra had one of those photoshop accelerators.