From: keith@cco.caltech.edu (Keith Allan Schneider) Subject: Re: Morality? (was Re: >So, you are saying that it isn't possible for an instinctive act >>to be moral one? That is, in order for an act to be an act of morality, >>the person must consider the immoral action but then disregard it? >No, I'm saying that in order for an act to be moral or immoral, somebody/ >someone/something must _consider_ it to be so. That implies intelligence, >not instinct. Who has to consider it? The being that does the action? I'm still not sure I know what you are trying to say. keith