Subject: Re: Concerning God's Morality (long) From: J5J@psuvm.psu.edu (John A. Johnson) <1993Apr3.095220.24632@leland.Stanford.EDU><1993Apr5.084042.822@batman.bmd.trw.com> Organization: Penn State University Lines: 48 In article <1993Apr5.084042.822@batman.bmd.trw.com>, jbrown@batman.bmd.trw.com responds to a lot of grief given to him >In article <1993Apr3.095220.24632@leland.Stanford.EDU>, >galahad@leland.Stanford.EDU (Scott Compton) a.k.a. "The Sagemaster" [ . . .] >But then I ask, So? Where is this relevant to my discussion in >answering John's question of why? Why are there genetic diseases, >and why are there so many bacterial and viral diseases which require >babies to develop antibodies. Is it God's fault? (the original >question) -- I say no, it is not. Most of Scotty's followup *was* irrelevant to the original question, but this is not unusual, as threads often quickly evolve away from the original topic. What I could not understand is why Jim spent so much time responding to what he regarded as irrelevancies. [ . . . ] >> May I ask, where is this 'collective' bullcrap coming from? [ . . . ] > >By "collective" I was referring to the idea that God works with >humanity on two levels, individually and collectively. If mankind >as a whole decides to undertake a certain action (the majority of >mankind), Well, I guess hypothetical Adam was "the majority of mankind" seeing how he was the ONLY man at the time. >then God will allow the consequences of that action to >affect mankind as a whole. If you didn't understand that, then I >apologize for not using one and two syllable words in my discussion. I understand what you mean by "collective," but I think it is an insane perversion of justice. What sort of judge would punish the descendants for a crime committed by their ancestor? >If you want to be sure that I read your post and to provide a >response, send a copy to Jim_Brown@oz.bmd.trw.com. I can't read >a.a. every day, and some posts slip by. Thanks. Well, I must admit that you probably read a.a. more often than I read the Bible these days. But you missed a couple of good followups to your post. I'm sending you a personal copy of my followup which I hope you will respond to publically in a.a. John The Sageless